Ortiz: Union confirmed I tested positive
July 31, 2009
NEW YORK (AP)—David Ortiz(notes) spent the afternoon answering questions about drugs,not his big home run.
Manny Ramirez(notes) brushed off news that linked him to more cheating.
One by one, some of baseball’s biggest stars keep getting implicated in anever-growing drug scandal that won’t go away. Ortiz became the latest,acknowledging Thursday that the players’ union confirmed he tested positive in2003.
Shortly after hitting the go-ahead homer in Boston’s 8-5 victory overOakland, Ortiz responded to a story on The New York Times’ Web site that he andRamirez tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs six years ago when theywere teammates with the Red Sox.
“I’ve just been told that the report is true,” Ortiz said in a statementafter contacting the union. “Based on the way I lived my life I’m surprised tolearn I tested positive.”
The popular Big Papi, who had never been linked to drugs, said he intendedto find out what was in his system and would tell the Red Sox and the public.
“You know me—I will not hide and I will not make excuses,” he said.
Alex Rodriguez(notes), Barry Bonds(notes), Roger Clemens(notes) and Sammy Sosa(notes) are among the manyAll-Stars tainted by the cloud of steroids and drugs, which has called intoquestion some of the sport’s greatest achievements over the last two decades.
Ortiz and Ramirez led the Red Sox to the World Series title in 2004—theirfirst in 86 years—and another championship in 2007.
Ramirez, now with the Los Angeles Dodgers, recently served a 50-gamesuspension for violating baseball’s drug policy. Asked about this second allegeddoping violation, he told reporters in St. Louis: “You want more information,I’m pretty sure you guys got the phone number to the union. Call the union, andthey can explain that to you guys.”
“Me and David, we’re like two mountains,” he said. “We’re going to keepplaying the game, and we’re going to keep doing good. We’re trying to moveforward; that’s the key here.”
Ramirez went 0 for 5 with a strikeout as Los Angeles beat the Cardinals 5-3in 10 innings Thursday night.
Red Sox manager Terry Francona, who guided Boston to those two titles, saidthe news “blindsided everybody,” including Ortiz.
“Nobody condones the use of performance-enhancing drugs,” he said. “Thetesting procedure was confidential. I don’t know how you can go back on thatnow.”
Yankees outfielder Johnny Damon(notes) played with Ortiz and Ramirez on thosechampionship Red Sox teams. Will fans think those Boston clubs were full ofsteroid users?
“That probably is what’s being said, and that’s what makes guys like meupset,” Damon said.
In 2003, 104 major leaguers tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs;the results were supposed to be anonymous and are now under court seal.
“Precisely for that reason, the Players Association will not, indeedcannot, comment on whether the information is accurate,” union leader DonaldFehr said.
The Times’ story cited lawyers involved in pending litigation over thetesting results who spoke anonymously because the information is under seal. Thenewspaper did not say what the players tested positive for.
“Can somebody in baseball—we’re all begging, people—get that stupidlist out and move on,” Chicago White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen said. “This isridiculous; this is embarrassing; this is a joke. Whoever is there is there, getthem out, and that’s it.”
There were no penalties for a positive test in 2003—the anonymous testswere conducted to determine if it was necessary to impose mandatory random drugtesting across the major leagues in 2004. But federal agents seized the resultsas part of the BALCO investigation. The union has argued the search was illegal,and the case is currently before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In the meantime, the names on the list keep coming out one by one.
In June, the Times reported Sosa also was on the 2003 list, and Rodriguezadmitted using performance-enhancing drugs after he was linked to the 2003 listearlier this year.
Major League Baseball declined to comment on the Times’ report, telling TheAssociated Press it didn’t have the list of players who tested positive in 2003.Red Sox owner John Henry did not immediately respond to an e-mail seekingcomment.
Try as it might, baseball has not been able to escape the drug stain.
“We’re just trying to move on and play the game, and play it clean,” Texaspitcher Kevin Millwood(notes) said. “And this cloud keeps looming over. And when thesenames keep leaking out, it just builds this whole thing back up again.”
The news revived an ongoing debate—should all 104 names be revealed?
“Coming out every couple months with a couple names here, a couple namesthere, it could go on for years and years and years. It reopens a wound we’retrying to close. I don’t know what can be done,” Seattle pitcher JarrodWashburn(notes) said.
Said Atlanta star Chipper Jones(notes): “It’s like somebody wants to keep this onthe tips of everybody’s tongues. And if that’s the case, I’d rather we just gotit over with.”
Ramirez was a long-established star in 2003. Ortiz, in contrast, had been apart-time player before that season.
Ortiz had never hit more than 20 homers with Minnesota early in his career.He came to Boston as a platoon player in 2003 and had four homers by July 1,then hit 27 the rest of the year.
Ortiz followed up with seasons of 41, 47 and 54 home runs as he stampedhimself as one of the game’s best sluggers. Last year he dipped to 23 homers,and his slump continued this season. He’s hitting only .228 with 14 home runs.
Its game time — sign up for Fantasy Football 09 today!
Comments
Got something to say?
